The reading and the lecture are about the accuracy of the claim that a well-known explorer reach the North Pole. The reading supports this claim, while the lecture casts doubt on them providing explanations for its objection as follows.
Firstly, the author of the reading argues that a committee was instructed to investigate the Peary's records and equipment and they concluded that they true and accurate. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this claim by stating that the committee was not objective. She explains that committee was consisted from Peary's friends and those who funded his expedition. Moreover, the work of the committee continued for two days only which makes any results are unreliable.
Secondly, the article says that another British explorer has made the same trip in similar conditions to examine the accuracy of Peary's ability to make this journey and it was a successful and complied with Peary's accounts. The professor, however, contends that this journey was different in many ways, for instance, the weight carried with him was less since he the food was dropped by plane, furthermore, the conditions of the weather were much better.
Thirdly, the text mentions that the photo taken by Pearl where the sun appeared with shadow that match the shadow of the sun the North Pole at this day according to the calculations. The professor , in contrast, rejects this claim by elaborating that the camera used by Peary was an old primitive one. In addition, the photo was fade and blurry which makes it unreliable source for measuring the shadow.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y, the author of the reading argues that a committee was instructed to investigat...
^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rding to the calculations. The professor , in contrast, rejects this claim by ela...
^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ding to the calculations. The professor , in contrast, rejects this claim by elab...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, for instance, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08076923077 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5819434135 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0349390746 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.090909091 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.5454545455 7.06452816374 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345682009921 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121245422606 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058908104485 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189571170282 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158909789262 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.