The set out related to Robert E. Peary which concerns him reaching the North Pole is the main debate of this passage and lecture. In the passage, three reasons are mentioned supporting Robert's claim which are argued by the lecturer.
Firstly, the declaration of the National Geographic Society committee is taken into acounte. Writer supports the committee's decision and believes that it is a solid evidence. However, the lecturer states that some friends of Robert found that committee and as a result their decision may have been biased.
Second reason relates to the duration of Robert's trip. Although, the travel's short duration cast doubts toward him, the passage supports his claim by comparing him some other explorer who had reached the same record. Lecturer, on the other hand, disagrees and believes that the conditions of the two explorer were not equal, so it may not be the best evidence.
And finally, in the passage it is mentioned that Robert's photographs are kept as an indicater that he actually had reached the North Pole and the writer agrees with that while the lecturer refuted this reason. In the lecture it is mentioned that Robert's camera, with which he had taken photos, are pretty old and based on the blurry and fade photos of it, there can not be any exact conclusion drive toward the location.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, firstly, however, may, second, so, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95089285714 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40779833567 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2900690499 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.818181818 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278229836994 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938817220104 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783827148135 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155735993503 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631330204867 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.