The possibility of maintaining a permanent human residency on Venus' surface is discussed by both the passage and the lecture. In the passage there are three reasons mentioned for the impossibility of living on Venus' surface, on the contrary, the lecturer refute all the reasons and asserts that it is possible to live on Venus' surface.
First reason, which is mentioned by the passage, relates to the fact that atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface is so high that it crushes every landing object. However, the lecturer suggests that by building a station locating 50 kilometers in the atmosphere, where there is less atmospheric pressure, they can overcome this issue.
Secondly, the absence of water and oxygen is mentioned by the passage as a reason for inhospitablity of Venus' surface and how difficult transferring these elements, from the earth to the Venus, is. Lecturer, on the other hand, disagrees and believes that since the primary components of these necessary elements are available in the Venus, they can produce them without any problem.
Finally, the issue of limited sunlight reaching the surface of Venus in stated by the passage and also the fact that residents cannot produce electricity due to this issue is also mentioned. However, the lecturer suggest that this problem can be addressed by building the station 50 kilometers in the atmosphere where there are plenty of sunlight available.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1195.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21834061135 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79139398848 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528384279476 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 24.411831148 49.2860985944 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 149.375 110.228320801 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.625 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.375 7.06452816374 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28612305254 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125250336021 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052845446104 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168994219418 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300207012526 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 53.8541721854 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.