The lecture and reading passage both about Robert E.Peary who claim that he was reach the North Pole. But some scientist skeptic about Peary travel on the North Pole. The author supports the Peary's claim and provide three evidence for supporting Peary truth. The lecturer cast doubt of each evidence made in the article. He believe that no solid prove found to Peary reach to the North Pole and author's evidence are unconvincing.
First of all, the author claims that committee check the Peary data. According to the investigation Peary's claim convincing and announce that he had complete the North Pole journey. This is point challenged by the lecturer. He mentions that committee investigation were not objective because scientist was Peary's friend and also he contributed money for Peary trip. Since examined data not properly checked, unreliable investigation and biased result.
Secondly, the author implies that Peary completed journey same speed and days as Tom Avery. The lecturer rebuts this evidence. He explains that Avery took less food as compared to the Peary and weather condition convincing when Avery traveled but unfavorable climate condition on the Peary journey. So, Peary cannot finished his trip.
Lastly, the author emphasizes that photographs of the surf position on North Pole was main evidence that Peary trip on North Pole. The lecturer, in contrast, points out that technique used by scientist to made the photographs. Primitive photographs were fuzzy and blur, even not precisely presented the sun position, therefore provided shadow photographs not trustworthy and realistic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Peary
...and reading passage both about Robert E.Peary who claim that he was reach the North P...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...f each evidence made in the article. He believe that no solid prove found to Peary reac...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39285714286 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63533595407 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56746031746 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6644227991 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9411764706 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8235294118 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.546833618445 0.272083759551 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17633760724 0.0996497079465 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124654295958 0.0662205650399 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.333730011375 0.162205337803 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938864888912 0.0443174109184 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.39 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.