The reading passage states three proofs for Peary had reached the North Pole, whereas the professor points out that the evidence is not solid and not convincing.
Firstly, the author insists that the investigation of authoritative committee confirmed his claim. The professor, however, argues that the investigation is indeed authentic but not objective, because there is Peary's friend who funded Peary's trip in the National Geographic Society. What is more the investigation only lasted two days and on the basis of Peary' words, the committee did not scrutinize his records. Therefore, the investigation is not convincing.
Secondly, the author says that citizens used to doubt that Peary could not reach the North Pole in only 37 days, but recently a British explorer spent even less than 37 days to reach the North Pole with the exact same equipment as Peary did. In contrast, the speaker reckons that they got the same site through varied ways for Avery brought much less food with him and his food was carried there by airplane. In this way, the explorer's route is too different to prove the assertion of Peary.
Lastly, the reading states that the exact position of Sun in Peary's photographs suggests that he had been there once. On the contrary, the lecture deems that scientists locate a site by measuring the shadow of Sun precisely and without the shadow they cannot predict the location. Nevertheless, the photographs were taken so long that they became blurred and faded, as a result, we presumably cannot calculate the position of Sun accurately.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, whereas, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08139534884 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66668075082 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577519379845 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7836115948 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.181818182 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4545454545 7.06452816374 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437173067992 0.272083759551 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132275952652 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124830408203 0.0662205650399 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231338173758 0.162205337803 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713945407909 0.0443174109184 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.