Both the lecture and the reading discuss about the whether Robert reached the north pole or not. But, the reading says that he reached the north pole, the lecture refutes this claim in different ways.
First of all, reading suggests that he reached the north pole because the national geographic association verified all his records and equipment which consider and declared that Robert reached the north pole. However,the lecturer counters this view by stating that it was objective, plus, trip fund was given by his friend. Further, it is biased not true statement.
In addition, reading claims that Tom Avery, recently reached their within 37 days same like Robert did and he also used the similar dogsled and same breeding dogs. The professor refuses this idea by stating that the condition was very different for both Robert and Tom, Tom did not carry any food which was supplied by the flight. Apart from that, condition was worst for Robert unlike Tom's trip-favourable for him.
Finally, the passage states that position of sun in the photograph which Robert taken- position of sun on those days are more accurate while exam it. Still, the speaker reputes this statement by explaining that the camera which used was primitive one and it is old photo with blared and faded picture that could not correct position at all. Even, he says that he might not taken the picture itself.
To sum up, the reading states that Robert reached north pole because of National Geographic association statement, Tom achieved the same goal at same amount of time and position of the sun in his photograph. But, speaker refutes all these all points with some logical explains and evidences. So, he disagrees with that Robert reached the north pole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...t Robert reached the north pole. However,the lecturer counters this view by stating ...
^^^^
Line 12, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith that Robert reached the north pole.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, still, while, apart from, in addition, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00684931507 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31776207085 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527397260274 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2014862267 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.428571429 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325024258004 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123633047842 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897020486937 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196931268173 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479097669259 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.