The article claims that using an ingenious weapon called a 'burning mirror' in the war between Romanians and Greeks is just a myth and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor refutes the article and each of the reasons.
First, the author poses that Greeks, in the past were not technologically professional enough to make this weapon. However, the professor opposes that ancient Greek was advanced because of meticulous mathematics who designed this device precisely. As a result, she says that mirrors were put along together accurately with a parabolic shape.
Second, the reading claims that a a burning thing with a mirror takes a long time, let alone the mega bodies of ships. However, the professor refutes the author and says that in two ways Romanian ships could be burnt just in ten minutes: first, ships were made of wood which is able to burn much easier than other materials and second, ships could burst into fire in one second because of a sticky material were used in that war.
Third, the article claims that those days, soldiers could use flaming arrows instead of the patented weapon. However, the professor says that, although the soldiers were vigor enough in using their ancient weapon the power of mirror for destroying the ships were more significant and more effective than flaming arrows
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: a
...ape. Second, the reading claims that a a burning thing with a mirror takes a lon...
^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ape. Second, the reading claims that a a burning thing with a mirror takes a l...
^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: a; a
...ape. Second, the reading claims that a a burning thing with a mirror takes a lon...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sticky material were used in that war. Third, the article claims that those day...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03603603604 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38985084529 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572072072072 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.7967065621 49.2860985944 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.222222222 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284057427412 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111690859713 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606583580645 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169889056181 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204149167505 0.0443174109184 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.