TPO 31 - Integrated Writing Task
In this set materials, the reading passage state that some lines which shown in the fossils of Sinosauroperyx did not evidence that Sinosauroperyx had feathers. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading by providing different reasons (and examples).
First of all, the reading passage indicates that the line was formed by decomposition of skin into fibers; in contrast, the lecture opposes this view by mentioning that we have not been seeing this kind of composition so far in other fossils in the volcanic ash, and fossils which are discovered in volcanic ash always resemble the skin structure of the animal very good.
Secondly, the reading argues that these lines look like remains of frills than stay of feathers; conversely, what the lecturer believes is different. She points that frills and feathers have different chemical composition. Feathers have some important components such as protein and Beta_ keratin; nevertheless, the frills do not have Beta_keratin. So after examining the composition of the fossils show that this fossil has Beta_keratin which show it is the feather.
Finally, according to the reading location of this line is back of the fossil were located on the tail and backbone of the animals; therefore, dinosaurs could not use feathers for flying. However, the lecturer believes that these feathers were colourful, and dinosaurs used to attract the male. Considering peacock for instance. The peacock uses the colourful feather to attract the male. So the feathers of the dinosaur were orange and white, they also used to attract the male.
- tpo 30 70
- TOEFL TPO 21 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- Do you agree or disagree？ It is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book thandoing physical exercise. Explain your answer with examples and specific reasons. 70
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 70
- TPO 18 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 350, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So after” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s, the frills do not have Beta_keratin. So after examining the composition of the fossil...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, as for, for instance, in contrast, kind of, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31906614786 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76224581966 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540856031128 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.0806168061 49.2860985944 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.916666667 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.3333333333 7.06452816374 217% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340883058438 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108374716159 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747790986416 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188910105097 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426019313372 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.