The lecturer and reading passage both discuss the strange sound hear in North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean is known as quackers. The author provides three theories caused the odd sounds. The lecturer casts doubt each of theory made in reading passage. He says that reason behind the quackers sound still controversial and expert present theories are problematic.
First of all, the author emphasizes that weird sound produced by female ocra whales for attracting male. This point challenged by the lecturer. He mentions that previously this sound detecting by the submarine is reasonable but unlike fact. The submarine were deep in the ocean and ocra whales lives on surface of water, so cannot submarine hearing sound of ocra whales.
Secondly, the expert implies that giant squid responsible for eccentric sound. The squids are giant marine invertebrates that habitat in deep in the ocean and eat by large fish. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He explains that Russian submarine detect the sound in 1960 to 1980 after 1980 this sound disappear and today this sound appear. This is not strong reason for odd sound of giant squid because hear one decade and disappear for two years.
Lastly, the author states that bizarre sound produce from the foreign submarine. The lecturer, in contrast, points out that the submarine in underwater suddenly change direction, moving fast and not produce any engine sound. He says that no advance technology produce such submarine which is silent and running fast.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s three theories caused the odd sounds. The lecturer casts doubt each of theory mad...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1975308642 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41174734553 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572016460905 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3485944661 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.9375 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1875 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348012042101 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110531927535 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720677969248 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208572699488 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578151188107 0.0443174109184 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.