According to the passage, in the United States, bird population was plummeted by increase population of the human settlement in bird habitat area, agriculture and pesticide. Whereas, according to the lecture, the professor say that the author provides reasons is unconvincing and challenge to each outlined presents by reading.
Firstly, the reading implies that surging the human settlement causes forest, wetlands, and grassland transfer into the home, mall, and office which directly effects on the bird population. However, the lecturer mentions that it is true that human population causes little types of bird population decrease but not another type of bird. Even increases other species of bird such as pigeon, landfill, hawk, and falcon. He says that it does not uniformly decrease whole bird species.
Secondly, the passage emphasizes that agriculture increase with human population, therefore, wilderness area use for agriculture purpose. As result, the decline bird populations. On the other hand, the speaker explains that it is prediction may be true in future but in present, USA day by day less use the land for agriculture. In fact, blot out the unnecessary plants.
Thirdly, the author's states that pesticide use in agriculture which kills the insect but this pesticide contact with the water and foods. Bird’s intake the poisonous insect and water causes die birds. In contrast, the professor points out that in past this happened but in the current situation, people aware this problem and invented new pesticide which is not contaminated the water and tradition pesticide not harm to birds.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, whereas, in contrast, in fact, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41106719368 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75879701294 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569169960474 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9478116738 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.307692308 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06452816374 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439405359319 0.272083759551 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147669688826 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983194149879 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240776775833 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135169652726 0.0443174109184 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.