tpo 32 the quackers sound
The material discusses the causes of the strange sound called quackers. While the reading looks ate the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely orca whales could make this odd voice. Next, this strange sound could be caused by giant squids. Finally, a secret submarine of another country could generate this sound.
Conversely, the lecture challenges the points, one specific contradiction is, it is true that orca whales could cause specific sound, but they usually live near the surface. However, submarines are deep in the ocean, so it is very hard to hear them. In addition to that, Russian submarines heard this sound in 1960, but it disappeared in 1980; on the other hand, giant squids still live there, so if they were the reason for this sound, this sound should continue till now. One final point, this sound moved with high speed and with changeable directions; however, submarines could not change their directions; moreover, with advanced technology today they could not move fast. As a result, quackers could not be caused by secret submarines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 743, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld not be caused by secret submarines.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, still, while, in addition, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 192.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25520833333 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46397657366 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635416666667 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5965869313 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.5 7.06452816374 219% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305789368853 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129632773838 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722409134077 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187586425856 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104294755502 0.0443174109184 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.