tpo 37
The material discusses the concept of using TED to protect endangered sea turtle species. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely catching any sea turtle is very rare. Next, implementing the time limit for nests under the water could be an effective way. Finally, TEDS are too small for the large sea turtles.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points, one specific contradiction, catching the sea turtle is a vital problem, because thousand of sea turtles are thearted every year; since they are endangered species, it is too serious. lossing big number every year could be big problem. In addition to that, the limit time way is an effective solution just in theory, given that government could not monitor boats use this approach; however, TEDS is easily to be enforced. One final point, TEDS which are used in areas have large sea turtles could be easily modified to be functional, since larger TEDS can be produced, it is no longer a problem.
In summary there are discrepancies in the presented information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... sea turtle is a vital problem, because thousand of sea turtles are thearted every year;...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lossing
... endangered species, it is too serious. lossing big number every year could be big prob...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...repancies in the presented information.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, regarding, so, while, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 7.30242825607 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 193.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20207253886 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69255623091 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60621761658 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1932126626 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.4 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.