TPO 33-1
The reading passage introduces different theories about the purposes and meaning of carved stone. While the professor refuses this theory and claims that these theories are unconvincing.
Firstly, although, the text opines that carve stones were weapons used in hunting and fighting, the professor believes that this kind of stone were broken up easily and after that other type of weapon had been common such as arrow for fighting or hunting purpose.
Secondly, the lecture claims that they were used as a part of a primitive system of weights and measures. Controversy, the professor elucidates that they had different uniforms; thus they have various density and they were not appropriate for measuring systems.
Eventually, though, the lecture claims that the third theory is related to using this stone as a social purpose, the professor opines that they were extremely simple and any kinds of them have never been found in graves. Therefore, we cannot conclude that they were used as personal positions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t they were used as personal positions.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thus, while, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 30.3222958057 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 1373.03311258 62% => OK
No of words: 162.0 270.72406181 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26543209877 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 4.04702891845 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50115809177 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 145.348785872 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604938271605 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 419.366225166 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7166967624 49.2860985944 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.857142857 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7142857143 7.06452816374 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347120721216 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160635480815 0.0996497079465 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552594245761 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207356662517 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235417644283 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.