TPO 37-1

Essay topics:

TPO 37-1

The text claims three reasons for rejecting the beneficial usage of turtle excluder device(TED), however the professor believes that TED is an efficient tool for protecting sea turtles and rejects the lecture's reasons.
Firstly, although, some shrimpers claim that turtles get trapped only rarely, the professor points out that there are thousands of shrimpers in the USA coast. Therefore, annually thousand sea turtles may be trapped by shrimpers which can lead to the population extinction of this animal sea.
Secondly, the reading suggests that shorting the time limit that shrimps boats are allowed to keep their nets underwater is an effective method than TED. Controversy, the professor claims that this method cannot be monitored by government, while TED is a standard tool for this purpose and government can introduce strong roles for using this method, even impose fine for boats who will not use from TED.
Eventually, though, the reading claims that TED is just efficient for small species of endangered sea turtles, the professor claims that TED can be modifies easily for large species. In fact, TED function is flexible for different size of sea turtles.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tles and rejects the lectures reasons. Firstly, although, some shrimpers claim ...
^^^
Line 2, column 182, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...s in the USA coast. Therefore, annually thousand sea turtles may be trapped by shrimpers...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ulation extinction of this animal sea. Secondly, the reading suggests that shor...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 30.3222958057 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 187.0 270.72406181 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27807486631 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57678556422 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625668449198 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.515678329 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06452816374 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.