Tpo 33
The article states that permanent station on Venus and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that there are some problems with this argument and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that people can’t live in Venus because there is some atmospheric pressure at Venus’s surface. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this point by saying that although the atmospheric pressure has a high amount in surface of Venus, it above the surface of Venus is equal to Earth. Also, this issue is related to physical effect which it helps people to live in Venus.
Second, the author claims that there are no reservoirs of water, which is one of the important sources for living and play a vital role in our life. On the contrary, the speaker concedes the point that there is some composition that leads to produce some necessary material including Co2, O2 and water. Therefore, people will abele to live on Venus’s surface.
Third, according to the reading, the amount of sunlight is insufficient to live on Venus. Conversely, the lecturer rejects the viewpoint since she thinks there are some clouds which aren’t so thin. Also, some solar can be produced by cloud. Furthermore, not only they can reflect sunlight, but also can generate power which all of them are vital for people that going to live in Venus.
.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which it helps people to live in Venus. Second, the author claims that there are...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 393, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...or people that going to live in Venus. .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10572687225 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59297340525 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581497797357 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4238894017 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5833333333 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0550616627925 0.272083759551 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0229392776628 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.012886436406 0.0662205650399 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.036503732305 0.162205337803 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00809444073337 0.0443174109184 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.