TPO 34 integrated
The reading passage suggests three possible theories that caused the extinction of Steller’s sea cow, while the lecture disagrees with them.
First, the author suggests that sea cows were over hunted by native Siberian people. However, the lecturer disputes this statement by pointing out that a sea cow is extremly massive. A villiage of Sibreian people could feed on a sea cow for a month. Therefore, Siberian people had no reason to hunt lots of them.
Secondly, the reading passage shows that the disturbances of ecosystems led to the decline of kelp which was the main prey of sea cow. Consequently, sea cows died because of no food and became extinct. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that kelp should not be the only one marine animal that was effected by the change of ecosystems. The lecturer provides the evidence that the number of whales which also lived there did not decrease which supports the lecturer's idea.
Last but not the least, the writer claims that fur traders which equipped with weapons from Europe kill abundant sea cows. Nevertheless, the lecturer disputes that there is a strong evidence proves the number of sea cows dropped drematically before 1700 which long before the Europens came.
In conclusion, the lecturer proposes some solid and vivid statements to challenge the theroies of the extinction of sea cows that the writer provides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...ere did not decrease which supports the lecturers idea. Last but not the least, the wri...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04366812227 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56784154236 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585152838428 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3018727863 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.25 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.06452816374 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420500373565 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169536174781 0.0996497079465 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821902625424 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237997162545 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527284805728 0.0443174109184 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.