Based on the given materials, the article as well as the lecturer discusses Hail, some freezed pieces that fall from clouds and encountering it in order to reduce farm damages. The author propose that a procedure called "cloud seeding" can have promising effect in this regard. That being said, the lecturer provide several ideas to repudiate this claim.
Initially, it is alleged in the reading that adding iodide, a silver chemical, to clouds can prevent shaping hails and instead they precipitate as snow since they are made of water vapor. However, the listening asserts that it might be effective only under laboratory condition but in real life it can prohibit any kind of precipitation. So cloud seeding can result in drought and consequently plants might damage from lack of water. Maybe it can solve one problem but at the same time causes bigger predicaments too.
Second, the writer proclaims that according to an experiment conducted in urban areas of Asia, since the people of that area were successful it can work in America too. Yet again, the speaker underscores that the experiment was done in urban are were the air is polluted and pollution provides a favorable condition for cloud seeding but in farm land where the air is cleaner it might not work. as a result working in an urban area does not necessarily meant it can work in farm land too.
The last point of contention between the listening and reading passages is a study conducted on central farm lands of America. The author states that in this study the crops where less damaged by implementing cloud seeding and this accounts for its effectiveness. On the other hand, the lecturer mentions that in that area not only the study vicinity experienced an improvement but also quarters near this are shows the same result. So she concludes that the improvement was not a result of the cloud seeding and was only a natural variation so the study is not strong enough to support the procedure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'proposes'.
Suggestion: proposes
...rder to reduce farm damages. The author propose that a procedure called 'cloud see...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...at the experiment was done in urban are were the air is polluted and pollution provi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...e the air is cleaner it might not work. as a result working in an urban area does ...
^^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “as” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e the air is cleaner it might not work. as a result working in an urban area does ...
^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mean'
Suggestion: mean
...g in an urban area does not necessarily meant it can work in farm land too. The la...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, second, so, well, as to, kind of, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91071428571 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64729758883 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9734137079 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.857142857 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.