Based on the given materials, the article as well as the lecturer are about zebra mussel out of control spread. The author states that the proliferation of them can cause disrupt in their new enviroment. That being said, the lecturer provide several ideas to repudiate this cliam.
Initially, the author says based on the history, their invasion is unstoppable and suggests The reason of their emergance is human transportation sine zebra mussel's primary habitat is eastern europe but now they can be found in other areas too. However the lecturer explains that their population is now controlable due to human knowledge. In past it might had been immpossible to counter this phenomena since people where not educated enough but now we know that salt water kill zebra mussel. Ships used to trasport this specie from fresh waters and transport them to their new place but it is ossible for a ship to empty its water in ocean where the water is salty and consequently the zebra mussels can not survive during the transportation process.
Second, the writer proclaim that since they have no preditor any where they go plus they hardy charactristics, they dominate the area. Also the writer points out that they have one of the highest production rate among different species. Yet again speaker underscores that this is not true. Allbeit they might not find any threat to themselves at the beginning but in a while soon another animals such as other fish and birds find out that there are new food available. The recognization of zebra mussels as food cause these species to change their habbits and results in a reorm of food chain in he area.
The final poin of contention between reading and listening passages is the decline in number of fishes. The author thinks that as zebra mussels dominate the area, the available food resources decreas since they are plancton eaters. On the other hand, the speaker mentions that this is not true for all kind of fish. The dominance of zebra mussels might cause the decline in number of some species but at the same time they suggest a new food resource for button fish waters so they can feed on them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...w they can be found in other areas too. However the lecturer explains that their popula...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t might had been immpossible to counter this phenomena since people where not educat...
^^^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: ANY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anywhere'?
Suggestion: anywhere
...oclaim that since they have no preditor any where they go plus they hardy charactristics,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...charactristics, they dominate the area. Also the writer points out that they have on...
^^^^
Line 5, column 594, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in the area'?
Suggestion: in the area
...ts and results in a reorm of food chain in he area. The final poin of contention betwee...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ges is the decline in number of fishes. The author thinks that as zebra mussels dom...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, second, so, well, while, as to, kind of, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 369.0 270.72406181 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82926829268 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45929248069 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 145.348785872 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531165311653 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.410015456 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.