TPO 36 Integrated Writing
Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decades, a method of reducing hail, called "cloud seeding," has been tried. In cloud seeding, the chemical silver iodide is sprayed on storm clouds from an airplane This makes the clouds produce harmless rain or snow instead of hail. Several pieces of evidence suggest that cloud seeding has been effective in protecting crops from hail.
The article states that cloud seeding by chemical like silver iodide is a very useful method to prevent hailing and increasing other precipitate like rain and snow instead and provides three reason of support. In the other hand, the professor said that these results are not clear and opposes each reason in the article.
First, the article avers that laboratory results support this theory which cloud seeding will decrease the hail formation and increase the chance of rain and snow. However, the lecturer argues this by explaining that these results have come from laboratory experiments. there is no guarantee that those will happen in the real situation. she asserts that this silver iodide can decrease not only the hail formation, but also it can prevent the rain and snow formation and finally cause drought and lack of water.
Second, the article brought some evidence from urban areas in asia to support her theory. In contrast, the professor opposes this and explained that these results may not be repeated in USA she adds that there are some differences between the climate and weather situation in polluted urban area in asia and clean farmland in USA she believes that pollution particle in the cities are good starter for cloud seeding. she asserts that this may not work in this clean area.
Third, the article adds some local studies results to its supportive evidences. it says that the silver iodide seeding can protect the crop in the field. On the other hand, the professor believes that in these local areas they did not included the neighborhood of them and there is some natural weather variation which can attribute to the results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pposes each reason in the article. First, the article avers that laboratory...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... have come from laboratory experiments. there is no guarantee that those will happen ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...hose will happen in the real situation. she asserts that this silver iodide can dec...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y cause drought and lack of water. Second, the article brought some evidenc...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 423, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...ies are good starter for cloud seeding. she asserts that this may not work in this ...
^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s may not work in this clean area. Third, the article adds some local studi...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...es results to its supportive evidences. it says that the silver iodide seeding can...
^^
Line 13, column 241, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'include'
Suggestion: include
... that in these local areas they did not included the neighborhood of them and there is s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01798561151 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3123006127 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503597122302 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.105692224 49.2860985944 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142332204249 0.272083759551 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540375470923 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355450552143 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08735399575 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134192038022 0.0443174109184 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.