Based on given materials, the article as well as the lecture discusses causes of mass extinction that was happened at the end of Triassic period. The author states that three different theories that could be responsible for the mass extinction. That being said, the lecturer provides several ideas to repudiate these theories.
Initially, the author says that based on sea levels' fluctuation, decline of sea levels may be a tangible reason for extinction. However, the lecturer explains that although in that period of time sea levels were fluctuating, it could not be a possible may for extinction. Furthermore, the lecturer explains that coastal and shallow-ocean's water were adopting to fluctuation. Beside that, this theory takes million years to be cause of extinction.
Second, the author proclaims that massive climate cooling by releasing large amounts of sulfur dioxide (SO2). Yet again, the speaker underscores that theory. She illustrates her opinion by explanation of SO2 which cannot had a sudden effect on climate. After that, the SO2 stills present in the atmosphere and it combines with water and atmosphere then falls as rain.
The final point of contention between the reading and listening passages is an asteroid strike. The author thinks an asteroid hit the Earth's surface. On the other hands, the speaker explains that there are only a few scientists have this theory. Based on, they have not found any creator of an asteroid strike. From the other viewpoint, they had found creator 20 million years before Triassic period. Thus, it cannot be a plausible reason for mass extinction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...lecturer explains that although in that period of time sea levels were fluctuating, it could n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...tuation. Beside that, this theory takes million years to be cause of extinction. Sec...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...hat, this theory takes million years to be cause of extinction. Second, the author pr...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, still, then, thus, well, as to, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2480620155 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7119598593 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577519379845 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.219480866 49.2860985944 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.6470588235 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1764705882 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.27373068433 304% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.060566670254 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0195674117071 0.0996497079465 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439606620953 0.0662205650399 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0422792964673 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572607149592 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.