The reading is about possibility of permanent presence of human on Venus. It states that extreme conditions on Venus make there impossible for human habitation and provided three reasons of support. Conversely, in the lecture, the professor holds a totally different view that beside all the challenges, living on Venus is possible and points to inaccuracies in each of author's reasons.
First of all, the article claims that atmospheric pressure at Venus surface is much greater than earth. The professor refutes this point by saying also the pressure is high on the surface, above 50 kilometers over surface the pressure is much lower, so there could be a station. This floating station located in a space where the pressure is similar to the earth. As a result, the station won't crush.
Furthermore, the reading posits that there is lack of essential resource for human being life such as water and oxygen in surface of Venus. The professor on the other hand explain that there are helpful chemical compounds in Venus which can help to produce water and oxygen. These chemical materials contain substances which easily could be extracted and make up water and oxygen.
Eventually, the article asserts that there is not enough sunlight over Venus surface because of thick layer of clouds. However, the professor says it’s true that there is thick layer in atmosphere which reflect the sunlight, but still there is reflected rays of light.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09663865546 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54708155769 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0347921485 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.083333333 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379795527012 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132247034282 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053980519294 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200480311244 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037458108497 0.0443174109184 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.