Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The environmental issue is too complex to be handled by the individual.
By and large, it is of very little doubt, if any, that environmental matter is an issue of great consideration and importance. It matters because Earth is the only home that humans have, and it provides air, food, and other needs. Consequently, the idea of caring for our planet may seem to have a priority. In this regard, some people wonder whether the environmental issue is too sophisticated for individuals to manage. I agree with the statement and believe individuals can’t take care of this important issue only by themselves. In the ensuing lines, I will provide two reasons for collaboration with this thesis.
The first idea worthy of consideration is that individuals do not possess adequate power for taking essential actions to solve the problems about the environment. These actions depend on large funding, therefore governments are in charge. Unquestionably, I think a global plan or strategy is vital for solving the problem of climate change. This global plan seems to be costly and needs collaboration between nations. Government representatives from each country should attribute in the universal meeting to achieve that global plan for solving the problems. As a case in point, I saw a documentary about protecting the oceans on the national geography channel. It stated that there are serious environmental problems related to the oceans such as damage to ecosystems due to global warming. According to that show, the UN calls for global management. After several meetings, the results were some complicated actions for each country such as give sufficient resources, reduce overfishing, and stop polluting the ocean by the waste of factories. These actions were impossible to be done if the UN didn’t take care of ocean protection. This example indicates that the environmental issue needs more than just individual contribution.
Secondly, another reason is that skilled and professional scientists are required to solve environmental problems. With a massive increase in natural disasters, warming and cooling periods, and different types of weather patterns, some serious and systematic analyses should be done if our planet wants to face these problems. Solving them depends on scientific knowledge which is time taking. Hence, that’s impossible for everybody to achieve that. For instance, I remember one of my friends in college majored in architecture and his final project was about “upcycle” which means using, again and again, materials in building instead of throwing them away. He wanted to design a building by decreasing the use of natural resources. His project was so demanding for him, as he told me he had to research several fields such as materials science, energy engineering, economics, and even biology. After one year of hard-working, he wondered that his project required much more time and energy than he was expected, and finally, he changed his project as he was so exhausted. Therefore, this shows that the environmental issue seems to be complicated for people.
To sum up, I firmly believe that although an individual’s attempts to resolve the environmental issues are noteworthy, it’s sophisticated for them due to a lack of adequate power and knowledge for taking serious actions.
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.76
- TPO-34 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Us83
- TPO 54 Integrated Writing Task90
- TPO 41 - integrated writing85
- TPO 51 integrated70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, i think, such as, by and large, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2739.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31844660194 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06357434925 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530097087379 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 861.3 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5713029243 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.444444444 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0740740741 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14814814815 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159651286382 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460124377254 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627842035577 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105381111766 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527558023591 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.