According to the given set of the reading passage, it is the author's conviction that living existence on Venus is impossible owing to the several highlighted reasons. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim and rejects each of the authors' specific point by providing some counter-arguments that are as follows:
First of all, the reading holds the view that the pressure in the atmosphere of Venus is much greater than the Earth. On the contrary, even though the lecturer agrees with this statement, but he asserts that by establishing a floating station, 50 kilometers above than the surface, can solve the problem because of the fact that pressure is lower than the surface of Venus and as a result, the condition is more analogous to The Earth. Hence, no danger threatens the crush of the station.
Secondly, although, the author posits that several gases such as carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid exist on the atmosphere of the Venus rather than reservoirs of water, the professor, says that due to the presence of these compounds, it is possible for human survival by producing oxygen and water by utilizing of some chemical materials.
As the last point to emphasize the reading claim, the author explains that the huge amount of solar radiation reflects by clouds, which cover the atmosphere of the Venus. Yet again, the lecturer refutes this point by saying that the clouds above the atmosphere of this planet are not very thick. Furthermore, the station is able to collect both solar radiation from the reflected by the clouds and the sun in order to produce electricity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...n set of the reading passage, it is the authors conviction that living existence on Ven...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...than the surface, can solve the problem because of the fact that pressure is lower than the surface of V...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, such as, as a result, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98876404494 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66192293635 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554307116105 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.0026595368 49.2860985944 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.5 110.228320801 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.375 21.698381199 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.75 7.06452816374 209% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24436359964 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094293704129 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042333533895 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134917741756 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592539684662 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.3589403974 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.