Both the passage and the reading discus about the living of human on the venous. The author of the passage believes that the living of human on the mars and mood could be possible, but on the venous is extremely impossible. However, the professor in the lecture opposes the lecture and give some advice about living in the atmosphere of the venous.
At first, he explains that the atmospheric pressure on the top of the dense atmosphere of the venous is enough low. Hence, a station can remain in its atmosphere and carry the human that is in contrast to the point in the lecture that states the human cannot live on the venous because of its high atmospheric pressure.
Second, the professor makes the point about producing water from carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid that are plentiful in the venous atmosphere. By this way, the human can survive on the venous that challenge the passage about the impossibility of human living on the venous because of the lack of water.
Finally, the lecture illustrates that the human can use the reflection of sunlight from dense clouds for generating the electricity. This point cast doubts the point in the passage that states there are a lot of dense clouds in the atmosphere of the venous, therefore the surface of this planet is very dark hence, the human cannot live on it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74891774892 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45900402073 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 145.348785872 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4329004329 0.540411800872 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7836671745 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.888888889 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1111111111 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157774123811 0.272083759551 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827568685206 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034027702825 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111461990796 0.162205337803 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269987755993 0.0443174109184 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.