The reading passage asserts that humpback whales use the stars for navigation and provides some evidences for that. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the passage and believes that these evidences are not convincing.
First of all, the author of the passage states these animals are enough intelligent to navigate by stars. However, the professor challenges this point and states that there is not a relationship between intelligence and the navigation ability. He provides one example of the dogs and the birds; and illustrates that although, the dogs are more intelligent than the bird, however, they do not migrate.
Furthermore, the passage believes that these wales migrates along the star lines. On the other hand, the leader of the lecture believes that these wales migrate along the magnetic field of the earth. Because there is a material in their body which is called Biomagnetic; that exists in the body of the birds that migrate by the magnetic field of the earth.
Finally, the lecture mentions an unusual behavior of this wales and states that these wales put their head on the water toward the sky. Then, the author concludes that this behavior clarifies that they are looking to the stars for navigation. However, the professor opposes to this acclaim and explains that other animals like Sharks have the same behavior but, they do not navigate. Therefore, the humpback whales do not navigate by stars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...lecture mentions an unusual behavior of this wales and states that these wales put t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpback whales do not navigate by stars.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, then, therefore, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08438818565 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50012017016 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464135021097 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.217902119 49.2860985944 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.416666667 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268488261744 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104543083839 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884186381911 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160670459061 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764567722483 0.0443174109184 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.