All of us have experienced a meeting or a classroom lecture, and we were in the position of the audience or the leader of the lecture. For having a good lecture, the leader and the audiences should know how to behave in the meeting. All of us know that the leader's duty is preparing the good information and proposing them. However, many people do not know that the audiences in a meeting how should behave. one of the most important duties of the audience is not to not disrupt the lecture. For instance, if they have a question or want to correct a point in the lecture, it is better to wait until the question time or until the end of the lecture. I will elaborate my opinion on the following reasons.
First of all, this is a polite manner to correct the professor's point. Because the leader may do not know the correct answer and when we suddenly point out the point, he or she will be shameful. Then the leader may lose his confidence and it will have a bad effect on his future. For instance, last year I was in a meeting that a professor was proposing a lecture, suddenly a student cut the professor's lecture and corrected a small point. Although the professor accepted the point and continued the lecture, he had been shameful and had a little stress. All of us may make incorrect points in our lectures, but the suitable manner for the audience is to wait until the end of the lecture.
Furthermore, by interrupting the lecture, the leader may be confused. Imagine that you are explaining a complex problem in a class, you have prepared some ordinary materials for illustrating the problem, suddenly in the middle of the lecture, a student cut your lecture and correct a small point. Then you should explain it to other students and consequently, you will lose some time and may forget what you have wanted to say. Therefore, it is better for the leader and the audience that all the questions and points propose at the end of the lecture.
Admittedly, if the audience points out the problem at the end of the lecture, then the professor will have enough time to think about the point and correct it in the next session. For example, I perceive that one of my professors in the class make an incorrect point, instead of cutting my professor's lecture. I correct it at the end of the session securely and the professor explained it to all the students in the next session. By this way my professor had enough time for thinking about it, hence, I think this is a better way.
All in all, in my opinion, we should point out the incorrect point in the lecture at the end of the session. Because this is more politely, we will not disrupt the lecture and the professor will have enough time to think about that point.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...in the meeting. All of us know that the leaders duty is preparing the good information ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...diences in a meeting how should behave. one of the most important duties of the aud...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2239.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50503018109 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53735337945 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.346076458753 0.524837075471 66% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3413185842 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.347826087 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6086956522 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4347826087 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105394158987 0.236089414692 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414187572494 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303537272368 0.0737576698707 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686313909157 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391887559418 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.77 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.