The article talks about the impossibility of human presence on venus and provides three reasons of support. however, the professor states that although it's challengable, it is possible and rejects each article idea by provides his own reasons.
First, the author insists that since on the venus there is high pressure more than the earth, either the spacecraft or the human would be crushed. in contrast, the professor reckons that this venus pressure would be reduced as the go upper than the surface therefore if they make a station with a balloon and go upper as much as needed therefore they wouldn't be crushed.
Second, the passage states that there is no evidence to show are there any water or oxygen in the Venus or not.it says that a good reason of why a human can't maintain there. on the contrary, the professor explains that on the Venus there is CO2 and sulfuric Acid that their reaction would produce water and oxygen, therefore, it going to solve that problem easily.
Third, the reading passage claims that Venus has a thicker cloud in its atmosphere which reflects the sunlight and Co2 which is inside it block the light too. consequently, humans can't use solar power cell in order to charge their equipment. the professor opposes this idea by saying that human not only can use the reflect sunlight from the thick layer but also they can use the passed sunlight which means that they have two sources to use cell power and charge their equipment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... and provides three reasons of support. however, the professor states that although its...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...acecraft or the human would be crushed. in contrast, the professor reckons that th...
^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... upper as much as needed therefore they wouldnt be crushed. Second, the passage stat...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... says that a good reason of why a human cant maintain there. on the contrary, the pr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...son of why a human cant maintain there. on the contrary, the professor explains th...
^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...which is inside it block the light too. consequently, humans cant use solar power cell in or...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ock the light too. consequently, humans cant use solar power cell in order to charge...
^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ell in order to charge their equipment. the professor opposes this idea by saying t...
^^^
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...a by saying that human not only can use the reflect sunlight from the thick layer but also ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79921259843 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33711412306 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547244094488 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.1017440201 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.444444444 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 21.698381199 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4444444444 7.06452816374 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362819673112 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142572027079 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062166016636 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192407718852 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635582632069 0.0443174109184 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.