the article talks about three theories which state that why early animals were larger than what they are today.it claims that lots of oxygen, vast of plant species and warmer weather in the early earth, are the reasons. However, the professor rejects each reason by providing his own reasons and he states that none of them aren't convincing.
First, the passage claims that in the past earth has a great supply of oxygen rather than today, therefore, it's animal was larger. the professor opposes this idea by saying that as some natural events like volcano were more usual than today, as it produces lots of toxic gases the oxygen supply were less than today. even though larger animals couldn't breathe. hence, this reason doesn't make sense.
Second, the reading states that on early earth there is lots of vast plant with high nutrient which help the animal to grow. but the professor refutes this idea by saying that, although there were vast plants they didn't nutritious enough. he continues that evidence in fossils show that they were lack of nutrients and they relied on Co2 but as the weather was contaminated at that time, it wasn't enough for them.
Third, the article says that warmer weather that early climate had, led to size increase of animals.in contrary, the professor states that small animals can stand better than large animals in warm weather. because large animals in order too cool their body, need to spend lots of energy that means to consume a lot of food, which wasn't enough at that time. thus warm weather is disadvantageous for large bodies and this idea doesn't make sense.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the article talks about three theories whic...
^^^
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...reasons and he states that none of them arent convincing. First, the passage claim...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...oday, therefore, its animal was larger. the professor opposes this idea by saying t...
^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...the oxygen supply were less than today. even though larger animals couldnt breathe. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the oxygen supply were less than today. even though larger animals couldnt breathe. hence, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... than today. even though larger animals couldnt breathe. hence, this reason doesnt make...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
... though larger animals couldnt breathe. hence, this reason doesnt make sense. Seco...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...als couldnt breathe. hence, this reason doesnt make sense. Second, the reading stat...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'there are lots'?
Suggestion: there are lots
... the reading states that on early earth there is lots of vast plant with high nutrient which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...nutrient which help the animal to grow. but the professor refutes this idea by sayi...
^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...t, although there were vast plants they didnt nutritious enough. he continues that ev...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...st plants they didnt nutritious enough. he continues that evidence in fossils show...
^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ather was contaminated at that time, it wasnt enough for them. Third, the article ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...ter than large animals in warm weather. because large animals in order too cool their b...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...t means to consume a lot of food, which wasnt enough at that time. thus warm weather ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
... food, which wasnt enough at that time. thus warm weather is disadvantageous for lar...
^^^^
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
... food, which wasnt enough at that time. thus warm weather is disadvantageous for lar...
^^^^
Line 7, column 426, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ntageous for large bodies and this idea doesnt make sense.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, second, so, therefore, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85818181818 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.08155695066 2.5805825403 81% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570909090909 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8317785853 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 18.0 4.19205298013 429% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344610537693 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126373502648 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689642441537 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21049194571 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426838801331 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.