The reading and the speaker discussing the strict regulation regarding the coal ash which is the by product of the power plants but the they are arguing things in very contrasts ways.
Firstly, reading passage says that rules and regulation regarding already existed for regulation of coal ash, so there is no need of strict regulation for example the plants has liner system for ponds. But, the lecture refutes this statement by saying that whatever regulation is there that only applicable for the new plants and what about the old plants. Which, makes lots damages to the environment.
Secondly, reading suggests that now the recycling process gives the benefits like bricks and the concrete which is by products they are getting through recycling process. So, if, regulation is strict then supplier will not by the these products because it causes the huge amount for them. Still, the speaker refuses this point by stating with one example that mercury which they do the long recycling process like more than 15 years but companies are buying the mercury now also.
Thirdly, reading claims that strict rules and regulations makes the electricity more expensive for the consumer due to the recycling process of coal ash. Again, the professor opposes this point by explaining that the overall recycling process causes 15 billions dollars but when it divided by all consumer it cost only one percent extra which reasonable for the consumer to maintain the good environment.
To sum up, the power plants companies representatives states that stict rules and the regulation not necessary because already rules are implemented, it cost supplier not to bye the by products and it cost more expenses for the consumer but the speaker refutes all these points with reasonable evidences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'they'?
Suggestion: the; they
... the by product of the power plants but the they are arguing things in very contrasts wa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...w plants and what about the old plants. Which, makes lots damages to the environment....
^^^^^
Line 8, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt. Secondly, reading suggests that now the recycling process gives the bene...
^^
Line 8, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ks and the concrete which is by products they are getting through recycling proce...
^^
Line 8, column 477, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ut companies are buying the mercury now also. Thirdly, reading claims that str...
^^^^
Line 11, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also. Thirdly, reading claims that strict rules and regulations makes the e...
^^
Line 11, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es and regulations makes the electricity more expensive for the consumer due to t...
^^
Line 11, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat the overall recycling process causes 15 billions dollars but when it divided ...
^^
Line 11, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s but when it divided by all consumer it cost only one percent extra which reason...
^^
Line 11, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sumer to maintain the good environment. To sum up, the power plants companies re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'regarding', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'third', 'thirdly', 'for example', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.271565495208 0.261695866417 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.143769968051 0.158904122519 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0702875399361 0.0723426182421 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0607028753994 0.0435111971325 140% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0287539936102 0.0277247811725 104% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121405750799 0.128828473217 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0575079872204 0.0370669169778 155% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.52798603302 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0159744408946 0.0208969081088 76% => OK
Particles: 0.00319488817891 0.00154638098197 207% => OK
Determiners: 0.124600638978 0.128158765124 97% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00319488817891 0.0158828679856 20% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0287539936102 0.0114777025283 251% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1813.0 1645.83664459 110% => OK
No of words: 291.0 271.125827815 107% => OK
Chars per words: 6.23024054983 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388316151203 0.374372842146 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.309278350515 0.287516216867 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.182130584192 0.187439937562 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.116838487973 0.113142543107 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52798603302 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487972508591 0.539623497131 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.6399786185 53.8517498576 88% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 29.1 21.7502111507 134% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9704412409 49.3711431718 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.3 132.220823453 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1 21.7502111507 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 0.878197800319 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 3.39072847682 295% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 60.0278350515 50.5018328374 119% => OK
Elegance: 1.93150684932 1.90840788429 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.553798828489 0.549887131256 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.171430843921 0.142949733639 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0952555904854 0.0787303798458 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.734050416825 0.631733273073 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.203187332617 0.139662658121 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.294954623593 0.266732575781 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10235110338 0.103435571967 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.430024905343 0.414875509568 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0542174240392 0.0530846634433 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.394078267616 0.40443939384 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553717591801 0.0528353158467 105% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.