Although the author provides three main reasons to indicate that new regulations for handling and storing ash in the United States is not necessary and they should be ommited, the professor finds them dubious and brings up three counterclaims to refute them all.
Firstly, the author states that some regulations already exist and companies which are going to build new landfills and ponds should be obliged to use these regulations. However, the professor gainsays this idea and states that these rules not only should be used for new companies but also old companies should be stricted to pay attention to these rules since they also contribute to significant harmful effects. For example, if they do not stay on rule, toxic and harmful materials will sink down to undergraound water and pollute the drinking water.
Secondly, the author claims that it has been predicted that recycling the coal ash would not be done any more in the case of stricting companies to use rules for handling and storing coal ash . The professor, on the other hand, asserts that these rules do not encourage them to prevent recycling. other indutries have been using these rules and these rules did not effect on the recycling processes. For example, mercury is a really harmful material. However, by recycling it, it can be safe for 50 years. Thus, no real concern did companies have.
Eventually, the author takes the view that the enhancing the fee of electricity as the result of increasing the cost of handling is not pleasant for people. In contrast, the professor believes that however it might cost alot, the average price that consumers should pay is not really so much. For instance, statistic data has shown that electricity consumed in this process costs almost 50 million dollors, while the amount of bill people should pay is only 1 percent of whole which is not a big deal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... rules for handling and storing coal ash . The professor, on the other hand, asser...
^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Other
...ot encourage them to prevent recycling. other indutries have been using these rules a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...ing these rules and these rules did not effect on the recycling processes. For example...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 533, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'company'
Suggestion: company
...for 50 years. Thus, no real concern did companies have. Eventually, the author takes t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94303797468 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52878422846 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537974683544 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.257089014 49.2860985944 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.153846154 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06452816374 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377629625452 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124017930337 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946572827603 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206158912045 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853391387497 0.0443174109184 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.