TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such har

The reading and the lecture are talking about the regulations for handling and storing coal ash. The author of the reading feels that the new regulations are not necessary, and there are three explanations of the new regulation. However, the lecturer oppose each of the author's explanation.
To begin with, the author argues that effective environmental regulations are already exist that companies have to use linear material that prevent coal ash from leaking out and harm the environment. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that the regulation of using linear material is controlled only in a new landfill. But it is not required to old landfill. As a result, the disposal of coal ash leak out to the surrounding environment like drinking water and harm it.
Secondly, the writer suggests that creating strict rules for storing and handling coal ash will discourage the recycling of coal ash into other products. Also, consumers may become concerned that recycled coal ash products are dangerous and they will stop buying it. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by saying that strict regulation of coal ash does not mean that consumers will stop buying the products. Consumers have high concerns and they respond positively to other dangerous products such as mercury. They know that mercury should be strictly handled, but after recycling mercury's products are safe. So, consumers have concern about it, and they are not afraid to buy mercury recycling products.
Finally, the author posits that new regulations would result in increasing the costs for the power companies and in turn, the price of electricity will increase. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that strict new regulations will worth the extra cost. All the amount of the cost may be around 50 billion dollars, they are large amount of money, but after doing the math, the result is each bill will increase only 1 percent. And that is not too much money.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...owever, the lecturer oppose each of the authors explanation. To begin with, the author...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in contrast, such as, talking about, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08695652174 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62127991022 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506211180124 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.462496334 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.552896007812 0.272083759551 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158123823106 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123281306718 0.0662205650399 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294534348827 0.162205337803 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792594375056 0.0443174109184 179% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.