tpo 41 regulation rules for handling coal ash

Essay topics:

tpo 41 regulation rules for handling coal ash

Based on the given material, the lecturer, as well as the reading passage, discuss the regulation rules for handling and storing coal ash which contains potentially harmful chemicals for the environment. The reading passage states that currents rules are quite sufficient. That being said, the lecturer provides three reasons to repudiate this claim.

First, the writer says that current regulations, such as requiring companies to use liner materials, prevent contamination by coal ash. On the other hand, the lecturer declares that companies use liner material in new landfill or new pond. Still, at old landfill and pond, the harmful chemicals from coal ash leaked into groundwater and contaminated drinking water. So more strict rules are needed to prevent environmental damage at all coal ash disposal sites.

Second, the author asserts that stricter rules might discourage the recycling of coal ash into other products, such as concrete and bricks, owing to the fact that consumers may think that these products are too dangerous. Yet again, the speaker explains that recycling other dangerous material such as Mercury has been taking place for 50 years. So people would not be afraid to buy recycled products by establishing more strict rules for handling and storing coal ash.

The final point of contention between the reading passage and the lecture is that stricter new regulations would cause noticeable increases in disposal cost for companies and would increase the price of electricity. So people would not be happy with these rules. However, the lecturer says that the increased price will be worthwhile. Though the cost for companies is about 50 billion dollars, the amount of increased cost for each bill will be one percent of the bill.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
This essay topic by users:
Post date Users Rates Content
2020-01-09 fafar 80 Read full essay
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, second, so, still, well, while, such as, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3024911032 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61872867951 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55871886121 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2342244525 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.428571429 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.562496271723 0.272083759551 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175176772154 0.0996497079465 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103541519685 0.0662205650399 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313895046889 0.162205337803 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842415049438 0.0443174109184 190% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.