TPO 42
The reading passage lists three possible solutions to prevent injuries of birds when they collapse into windows while the professor in the lecture thinks none of these solutions is effective.
The first solution the professor argues is that the one-way glass cannot solve the problem because of they just like mirrors that can reflect things. Birds who do not understand mirrors would think the sky and trees in mirrors are real and then fly into the windows. That is to say, the claim in the reading that replacing the transparent glass with one-way glass can protect birds is not convincing.
Secondly, the reading holds the view that adding some colourful designs, like thin stripes, can alert birds there are objects. The professor, however, mentions that this kind of small decoration will leave the opening area which is a hole in birds' eyes. In that case, birds will not avoid it, too. Although a larger design may be effective, it will darken the room. Thus, the professor fights against the view in the reading again.
Furthermore, the professor represents his idea that artificial magnetic field is only used by birds in long-distance trips. They use magnetic field when they migrate and use eyes in the short-distance fly. So, it will not have effect for birds flying within or between cities, which is far from the suggestion in the reading that by emitting magnetic signals, people can manipulate birds' flying directions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
... one-way glass cannot solve the problem because of they just like mirrors that can reflect thin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, kind of, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05020920502 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46819370845 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589958158996 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3668943201 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.583333333 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404927624482 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137399545064 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770042553879 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223036334773 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692772466744 0.0443174109184 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.