tpo 42

Essay topics:

tpo 42

Both the reading and the lecture discuss that modern architecture has made problem for birds. In the reading section, the writer contends that there are three solutions for protecting birds from injuries that may make by using windows in buildings; however, the professor casts doubt on the reading points by presenting some reasons and examples.
First of all, the writer claims that it is better that utilizing one-way glass instead of usual glass for making buildings because the birds do not see through a window and seems it is a mirror, so they do not make attempts to fly toward this window; in contrast, the professor rejects this notion by stating that the birds do not know a mirror and in the mirror they see sky or tree. Therefore, they are encouraged to fly through window.
Moreover, contrary to the idea in the reading suggesting that a colorful window leaves an impact on birds to detect a window and people can use an opening in this building, the lecturer asserts that the birds presumes this opening is a hole, so they try to through it. If there is a small opening in a building, the birds cannot fly through it; however, the building looks dark for people.
In addition, even though the writer indicates that birds have a magnetic feature, so if human make a magnetic field, the birds can navigate in the correct direction and protect from hurts, the professor mentions that birds use this features for far distance and migration not short distance. Hence, birds use their eyes and light for flying in cities, so magnetic field is not a cost-effective way.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'first of all']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254125412541 0.261695866417 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.158415841584 0.158904122519 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0528052805281 0.0723426182421 73% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0561056105611 0.0435111971325 129% => OK
Pronouns: 0.029702970297 0.0277247811725 107% => OK
Prepositions: 0.145214521452 0.128828473217 113% => OK
Participles: 0.03300330033 0.0370669169778 89% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.45218812432 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.016501650165 0.0208969081088 79% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.135313531353 0.128158765124 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.013201320132 0.0158828679856 83% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00660066006601 0.0114777025283 58% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1579.0 1645.83664459 96% => OK
No of words: 274.0 271.125827815 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76277372263 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.357664233577 0.374372842146 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.262773722628 0.287516216867 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.156934306569 0.187439937562 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0875912408759 0.113142543107 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45218812432 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521897810219 0.539623497131 97% => OK
Word variations: 51.2067957031 53.8517498576 95% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0529801325 61% => OK
Sentence length: 34.25 21.7502111507 157% => OK
Sentence length SD: 110.2649508 49.3711431718 223% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 197.375 132.220823453 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.25 21.7502111507 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 0.878197800319 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 60.5273722628 50.5018328374 120% => OK
Elegance: 1.77027027027 1.90840788429 93% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.635553260858 0.549887131256 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.2305912824 0.142949733639 161% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.046632064457 0.0787303798458 59% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.735707496327 0.631733273073 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.208034844737 0.139662658121 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.32377107728 0.266732575781 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10511232994 0.103435571967 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.352174232949 0.414875509568 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0418552565863 0.0530846634433 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.425903437332 0.40443939384 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928987658172 0.0528353158467 176% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.49668874172 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.