The article states that birds does not notice building’s windows and they get injured when they try to fly through it and provides three possible solutions for this problem. However, the professor explains that none of the solutions are effectively applied to avoid birds getting injured and refutes each of the author’s solutions.
First the reading claims that instead of normal glass, one-way glasses can be used to make a barrier for birds. The professor refutes this point by saying that there is a problem about one-way glasses. He states that that kind of glasses reflect vision like mirror and birds do not understand whether it is mirror or not. If the glass reflect sky toward birds they think it is really sky and they still try to fly through it.
Second the article posits that colorful lines or other designs can use on regular window glass to change its view. However, the professor says that if the design is big birds think that it is a hole and they move through it. According to professor, on the other side if the design is small enough to be noticed by birds at this time the room would be dark and so it is not an efficient solution.
Third the reading says that an artificial magnetic field can be used and through natural magnetic abilities of bird, they can be routed another direction. However, the professor opposes this point by explaining that it is true, they have a natural ability but they do not use it everytime they fly. We also learn that birds use the ability when they migrate from one place to another like that cold place to warm one. When they fly in short distant such as one side of city to another city they do not use the ability and so it does not work.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, second, so, still, third, in short, kind of, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58766233766 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29797433292 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49025974026 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9483397958 49.2860985944 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.692307692 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476826031299 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174694136852 0.0996497079465 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745933071717 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286325642165 0.162205337803 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499002694828 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.