According to the reading material every year, million of birds injure when they try to fly through glass windows however there are several solutions to prevent injuries to birds. However, in the listening, the professor refutes what says in the reading passage by providing three outstanding reasons.
Firstly, in the reading passage, it is said that one solution is to replace the regular glass with one-way glass that is transparent only one direction. So, birds cannot see through a window and will not try to fly through them. In contrast, the professor in the listening rejects this solution. He states that one-way windows has a problem.this kind of window reflex just like a mirror. In addition, birds do not understand mirror and when they see the pictures of the sun or trees in the window they try to fly through it.
Secondly, the reading passage claims that second solution is to paint colorful lines or other designs on clear window glass. But, the professor believes it is not functional. Birds want to fly through the glass if they see some lines and designs. Also, this kind of glass would prevent sunlight to the room and room becomes very dark for people.
Finally, the reading passage believes that creating an artificial magnetic field to guide birds away form buildings would be very practical because birds can sense Earth's magnetic fields during their flying. On the other hand, the listening disagrees with this solution. He states that birds use their natural ability to sense Earth's magnetic fields when they travel for long distances to figure out which direction is better. When they fly for short distances between cities they utilize their eyes and senses to navigate. So, this solution would be ineffective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ing to the reading material every year, million of birds injure when they try to fly th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, in addition, in contrast, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05517241379 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40541402816 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531034482759 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.880166382 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.625 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.584731266934 0.272083759551 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169401259221 0.0996497079465 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119968233305 0.0662205650399 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335610561538 0.162205337803 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645136404599 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.