The article discusses about birds injuries related to building glasses. According to the article every year many birds die when they try to fly through glasses windows because the birds cannot distinguish between glass and open air and provides three solutions for that. However, the professor explains that the proposed solutions by the article are not effective and refutes each of the author's solutions.
First, The reading claims that if we use one-way glass the birds cannot see through the window and therefore detect it as a solid barrier. On the other hand, the occupants of the building can see through these glasses. The professor refutes this point by saying that these kinds of glass
reflect just as a mirror and maybe it reflects sky or a tree. He states that birds will go through these glasses because they cannot underestand the reflect of the sky or the tree is fabricated.
Second, the article posits that colorful designs let people in the building see outside but hinder the birds to collide with the windows simultaneously. However, the professor says the problem of colorful designs is that the birds see the space between colorful lines as a hole and therefore they preceive they can fly through it. According to the professor, if we make most of the area on the windows colorful then the inside of the building becomes dark.
Third, the article says that making magnetic fields around the building emits magnetic signals in which prevent birds from flying around the building. The professor opposes this point by explaining that the birds use the magnetic field for traveling a long distance like from a colder country to a warmer one. On the other hand, the birds just use their eyes or brightness of the light for traveling short distance like hanging around a city. In this regard the magnetic fields cant steer birds to the directions away from the building.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...glasses because they cannot underestand the reflect of the sky or the tree is fabricated. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ity. In this regard the magnetic fields cant steer birds to the directions away from...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9125 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39397029012 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48125 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6889281152 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.285714286 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.531405966267 0.272083759551 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182357826982 0.0996497079465 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104088495765 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276591426696 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698886085991 0.0443174109184 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.