Generally speaking, there are many debates about educational methods and how it has to be. However, many experts contend the students first need to learn the facts.On the other hand, proponents of deep understanding of concepts believe which students chiefly have to become familiar with reasons of fundamental axioms. Although learning facts has its advantages, in my point of view, I strongly recommend to deep understanding of facts which leads to bearing competence students for the following reasons.
One important aspect of deep understanding is that students will learn to conclude the facts by themselves. In this learning method students will become capable of proving facts on their own. By the same token, This method is beneficial because students will never forget the axioms, and they completely become familiar with infrastructures. According to varies types of research, students who examined the concepts by themselves are more successful in recalling the facts after a few years in contrast to students who just memorized these axioms. For example, I still remember many facts about geology because the professor of geology class back in college was pursuing this method and many students achieved this capability to conclude the results by themselves from the evidence. Although I just remember a few formulas in math because I and other students were busy with memorizing the facts whole time, and after a few years they are vague in my mind.
Another equally important point about deep understanding is that it gives students motivation for further learning and research. It encourages students to enjoy scientific matters and change the boring atmosphere around scientific courses. Even though in future it helps students to become a scientist, and prove their own theories based on the facts rooted in their mind not some nonsense concepts which they memorized. For example one of my friends who is a successful scientist now had this habbit in college which he never accepted the axioms without knowing the philosophy behind it and was obsessive about it. When I asked him about the key-point of his achievements he explained that he owes everything to this habit.
So based on all points mentioned above, it has many advantages in contrast to just memorizing the facts without knowing the cause which is hidden behind it however, many professors still don't believe in this method.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
... students first need to learn the facts.On the other hand, proponents of deep unde...
^^
Line 2, column 355, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'vary'.
Suggestion: vary
...liar with infrastructures. According to varies types of research, students who examine...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 616, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y behind it and was obsessive about it. When I asked him about the key-point of his ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ehind it however, many professors still dont believe in this method.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, still, as to, for example, in contrast, in contrast to, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23772609819 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75654041264 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498708010336 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.9299064245 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.133333333 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233809542828 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883697957019 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811837833925 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141506474635 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843956965048 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.