The reading and the listening passages are both about glass windows and injuries of birds. While the reading passage provides three solutions that businesses can use to prevent injuries to birds, the listening passage explains that these solutions are not effective.
First of all, the author mentions that companies can apply one-way glass to buildings. By doing these occupants of the building can see through and birds cannot see through, as a result, birds will understand that the glass forms a solid barrier and will not try to fly through it. The lecturer refutes that by saying the birds will see one-way glass as a mirror and if the mirror reflects the sky or a tree, the birds fly to it and get injured. Because of that, the professor does not agree with this solution.
Secondly, the reading passage mentions that providing a colorful design, which is thin painted strips over the glass, will help both people to see through the opening area and birds to understand that this is a building and they will avoid it. However, the lecturer stats that the birds will fly through the opening areas and if they make they cover most of the glass, the building will be dark.
Finally, the article mentions that applying a magnetic compass to building will be beneficial sine birds use it to determine their directions. On the other hand, the speaker points out that this is true, but birds use the magnetic compass in order to migrate or travel for a long distance, for example, from cold to warm weather. Also, he adds birds do not use within cities and they rely on eye and brightness of the sky. Because of that, this solution is not effective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that these solutions are not effective. First of all, the author mentions that c...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssor does not agree with this solution. Secondly, the reading passage mentions t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the glass, the building will be dark. Finally, the article mentions that apply...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 473, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f that, this solution is not effective.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75432525952 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3224567059 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494809688581 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1257749765 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.552676126713 0.272083759551 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185444258835 0.0996497079465 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110930310044 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301571553593 0.162205337803 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118378632912 0.0443174109184 267% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.