The reading passage and the lecture both discuss agnostids and their behavior. The passage states some theories about how they might have lived. However, the lecture does not agree with what the passage proposes and refutes all the theories.
First off, the passage considers the agnostids as free-swimming predators. Not having been convinced, the speaker asserts that free-swimming predators usually have large eyes to see their targets and hunt them. She proceeds to say that theagnostids had tiny, poorly developed eyes. Furthermore, in some fossils they did not have any eyes. Consequently, they were not able to hunt smaller organisms and this theory is ruled out.
Moreover, the author of the passage states that the agnostids may have been seafloor dwellers. On the conrary, the professor argues that seafloor dwellers do not have the ability of swimming fast or far. She elaborates that the fossils of the agnostids have been found across large distances and it indicates that the agnostids could move fast which is an unusual if they dwelled of the seafloor. Therefore, she casts doubt on this theory and proves it wrong.
Finally, she does not approve the third theory stated by the passage which proposes that the agnostids were parasites. The professor declares that parasites organisms do not have a large population, Since it can destroy the host organism. She delineates the fossils of the agnostids shows they had lived in large group. Thus, this theory about the agnostids can be proven wrong.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wrongs'?
Suggestion: wrongs
...asts doubt on this theory and proves it wrong. Finally, she does not approve the t...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'thus', 'well']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.211678832117 0.261695866417 81% => OK
Verbs: 0.200729927007 0.158904122519 126% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0583941605839 0.0723426182421 81% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0620437956204 0.0435111971325 143% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0583941605839 0.0277247811725 211% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0948905109489 0.128828473217 74% => OK
Participles: 0.043795620438 0.0370669169778 118% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.54438100091 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0109489051095 0.0208969081088 52% => OK
Particles: 0.0036496350365 0.00154638098197 236% => OK
Determiners: 0.131386861314 0.128158765124 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0182481751825 0.0158828679856 115% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.014598540146 0.0114777025283 127% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1519.0 1645.83664459 92% => OK
No of words: 246.0 271.125827815 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17479674797 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04852973271 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.365853658537 0.374372842146 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.292682926829 0.287516216867 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19512195122 0.187439937562 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.146341463415 0.113142543107 129% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54438100091 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 51.3898458433 53.8517498576 95% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.375 21.7502111507 71% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1045611869 49.3711431718 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9375 132.220823453 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.375 21.7502111507 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8125 0.878197800319 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 44.6432926829 50.5018328374 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.09090909091 1.90840788429 57% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.575021124547 0.549887131256 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.144836947194 0.142949733639 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0908166398775 0.0787303798458 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.571051252485 0.631733273073 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.176045211873 0.139662658121 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.239776632264 0.266732575781 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110937282951 0.103435571967 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.380103020254 0.414875509568 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.136963631736 0.0530846634433 258% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.399098900171 0.40443939384 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945832590642 0.0528353158467 179% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.26048565121 188% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 3.1766004415 220% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.