tpo 44
The passage and the talk both discuss the genuinity of one coin which was discovered in Maine of United States. The writer contends that the coin is not originaly brought by European explorers named Norse. The lecturer, however, refutes the author's assessments. She demonstrateds three reason to cast doubt on the claims made in the reading.
The first allegation of the script against which the orator argues is that the great distance between the Norse dwelling and the site where the coin was found is great. In contrast, the professor highlights the fact that archaeologists have found many objects far from Maine settelment which indicated that native americans were interested in traveling and finding unique objects all over the country.
Second, according to the text, there was no other coin found at Canadian sites; though, the speaker finds this idea debatable. She bolsters her opinion by stating that Norse explored wherever they wanted and finally have got back to their own place in Europe. She further asserts that it could be possible that they brought so much amount of coins by themselves and then returend the remaining part of them.
Lastly, The lectur contradicts this fallacy of the passage that the silver coin is not beneficial for North Americans community, saying that Norse members were aware of the native american enthusiasism in finding and exploring new objects. What is more, it was obvious that they really liked jwelleries and vovel object eventhough the coin was not worthwile in terms of value due to the material. So it is not surprising that they brough some coins for them to fascinate them
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ught by European explorers named Norse. The lecturer, however, refutes the authors ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, lastly, really, second, so, then, thus, well, in contrast, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05185185185 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51937893799 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607407407407 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6122488506 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437440087301 0.272083759551 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134098133863 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682905333869 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237778020458 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279407206392 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.