tpo 44
The lecture and the reading are both about the coin is genuine historical or not. The teacher says that this coin is not fake. However, the reading states that these money pieces are not genuine.
Firstly, the issue of a distance Norse from native Americans. The professor says that although the Norse is too far from America. The native Americans brought other objects from Europa. They brought many things not just coin from a far distance. However, the reading says that This coin is not brought from a far distance.
Secondly, the trouble of finding other coins. The lecturer says that no more coin is not necessary that coin is not genuine because the native Americans might bring these coins and returned them when they are back to Europe. on the other hands, the reading says that the Norse did not bring any silver coins with them.
Finally, the problem of using European coins. The professor says that Norse was using these coins but might be not more found because new value appears for these coins. These money pieces are making from silver. the people might use this precious metal to make a necklace and use it in trade with them. However, The reading disagrees with this concept. it says
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 226, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...rned them when they are back to Europe. on the other hands, the reading says that ...
^^
Line 19, column 213, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...se money pieces are making from silver. the people might use this precious metal to...
^^^
Line 19, column 354, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...he reading disagrees with this concept. it says
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 210.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8380952381 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.03923532865 2.5805825403 79% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 145.348785872 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471428571429 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7905321054 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.5 110.228320801 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.125 21.698381199 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356349819552 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121193295403 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819998661128 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23742911996 0.162205337803 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753074604332 0.0443174109184 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.3589403974 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 53.8541721854 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.0289183223 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.9 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.42419426049 81% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 63.6247240618 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.