The reading and the lecture are both about silver coin found in the state of Main in the United States, which possibly was brought there by the European explorers. The author of the reading believes that this coin is fake. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article because she believes it is genuine.
To begin with, the author points out that the coin was discovered far from the territory Norse people were in America. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She thinks that Norse came to North America not only for coins. Furthermore, she argues that Norse bring coins with them and then traveled back to home.
Secondly, the author contends that there were more coins and probably of that it is nothing to do with the Norse community. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She suggests that Norse traveled to America to find a treasure and, in the end, took everything with them.
Finally, the author states that Norse people knew that silver coins had no price in North America and, hence, they do not likely needed that money. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that Norse was taking anything they found interesting. She puts forth the idea that silver coins may be used as the jewelry and, as a result, this coin is authentic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...eading believes that this coin is fake. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 2, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th them and then traveled back to home. Secondly, the author contends that there...
^^^
Line 4, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d, as a result, this coin is authentic.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, hence, may, second, secondly, then, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69230769231 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18719196353 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547511312217 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2793706933 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7692307692 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400188548458 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143233035707 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831060874927 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250664666728 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510885476003 0.0443174109184 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.3589403974 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.42419426049 82% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 63.6247240618 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.