In the lecture, the professor makes series of points that challenges all the arguments presented in the reading passage about the European silver coin found in Main archeological site. She states the coin is genuinely a piece of historical evidence and refutes all the reasons stated by the author.
First of all, the professor states that a great distance between the site and Norse settlement is not a good reason to refute the possibility of not having real connection. Also, she says lots of other material has been found within this two distance places. So, the ancient people travelled between places at that time to bring different object from different places.
Also, the speaker believes not finding other coin not necessarily means they do not have historical value. She states Norse was not permanent settler at that time and when he came to north America from Europe he packed up all silver coin with him and in the time of coming back to Europe he bring them back with him.
Lastly, the author states there was no use for the coin at that place. However, the professor refutes the uselessness of coin for north American. She states it had beauty attraction for them and they could use it as jewelry for necklace or using for trade.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'brings'.
Suggestion: brings
...in the time of coming back to Europe he bring them back with him. Lastly, the author...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78703703704 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39066471463 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7445078671 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398376407613 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153789417139 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654613777814 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217743501455 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394504627666 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.