TPO 45
The article states that Did bees have been existing on Earth for 200 million years. This prospective is on the basis of fossil structures, which are discovered in Arizona, that resemble bee nests. However, the professor explains that it is possible and the arguments are not convincing and casts doubt on each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading posits that there is not any evidence of actual bees' fossils. The professor refutes this point by saying that it is true that there is not any evidence of for those fossils but the trees which preserve the fossils were quite rare.
Second, in the article it is claimed that the due to the fact that bees are dependent on flowers to feed and in that period there was not any flower, it is not possible for this theory. However, it is plausible for bees to feed on non-flowering plants, the professor says. According to the professor, early bees may benefit from plants like pine trees and later, when flowering plants emerged they adapted themselves on them and this situation became stable during the time.
Third, the reading asserts that fossilized details which are found in Arizona lack some of the finer details of bees' nests. The professor opposes this point by clarifying that some chemical evidence has suggested that the method of protection of modern bees is based on being water proof. We also learn that it has turned out that modern bees have the same content of water as the early bees had.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...details which are found in Arizona lack some of the finer details of bees nests. The profes...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: waterproof
...ection of modern bees is based on being water proof. We also learn that it has turned out t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7874015748 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31886755859 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523622047244 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7079905653 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.545454545 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113999591231 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476216883931 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029658261325 0.0662205650399 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073158996741 0.162205337803 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116382593583 0.0443174109184 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.