In this set of materials, the reading passage states that some fossils are discovered in Arizona that they may resemble bees nests, but some sceptics say that this fossil not belong to bees and provide 3 reasons. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading points by providing different reasons (and examples).
First, the reading passage indicates that the earliest fossils record of bees belong to 100 million years ago, and the fossils of bees have not been found from 200 million years ago. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this view by mentioning that it is true that no fossils remain from 200 million years, but it is not mean that bees could not exist. On that time, bees could not preserve fossil because fossils need to fossilized that produce by resin of trees, and on that time, the trees could produce resin were rare. So, the fossils of bees could not produce, and it is not mean bees could not live.
Furthermore, the reading argues that 200 million years ago, flowering plants could not exist, so bees did not have food, and they could not live; conversely, what the lecturer believes is different. She points out that before flowering plants, bees would eat non-flowering plants such as ferns and pine tree, and they adapt with them. In addition, when the flowering plant started to grow, bees could start to eat them.
finally, according to the reading, the fossils in Arizona are similar to moderns bees, but they do not have some parts such as caps, so they could not belong to bees. However, the professor believes that the chemical experiments show that modern bees nests have chemical components that are against water like waterproof. Also, when scientist starts to the chemical analysis of fossils, they understand the fossils have the chemical components as the same as modern bees.
- TPO 46 : Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 70
- In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain you 50
- TPO 45: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and ex 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- people rely on technology is good 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
...row, bees could start to eat them. finally, according to the reading, the fossils ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, in addition, in contrast, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 313.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92012779553 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29674909282 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479233226837 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.51434878587 528% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.6079834864 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06452816374 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968741024535 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439094623435 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0238774671732 0.0662205650399 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651998805021 0.162205337803 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0083465431664 0.0443174109184 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.