The reading and the lecturer are both about the size of past animals which were very large compare than todays animals. The author of reading believes that the large size of animals in the earlier earth must be due to presence of plenty of oxygen, nutrient and warm climates. The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made in the article. He thinks that being scientist there is no reason to abundant common sense and conclude based on the fact which author of reading failed in this article.
First of all, the author points out that large size of animals must be due to plenty of oxygen in earlier earth. It is mention that oxygen-rich environment stimulate growth and produce large arrays of animals. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that there was very less oxygen in earlier earth. Furthermore, he argues that it was difficult for the animals to breath in the past due to presence of more volcano activities.
Secondly, the author contends that plenty of nutrient was provided by the abundant plant life on the earlier earth. The article notes that nutrient is vital for animals fully grow. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggests that earlier earth had low amount of nutrient. He elaborates this by mentioning that indeed true there was vast amount of plant but they had low nutrient according to recently fossil studies.
Finally, the author states that warm climate tended to stimulate growth. The article establishes that animals did not needed to expend much energy to stay warm due to warm climate instead they used for generating large bodies. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that small animals are found in warm climate. He puts forth the idea that it was difficult for the large animal in order to maintain their body in warm temperature.
In conclusion, the lecturer effectively casts doubt on all the claims and theories made in the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... of oxygen, nutrient and warm climates. The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made ...
^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'need'
Suggestion: need
...rticle establishes that animals did not needed to expend much energy to stay warm due ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85758513932 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37002111111 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 481.5 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2381370448 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5789473684 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36108803169 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117298223225 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840731595499 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189874885437 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104090941935 0.0443174109184 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.