The reading and the lecture are both about possible nests fossils that are related to did bees which are a kind of insect. The reading believes that there are doubts that these structures built by did bees. However, the lecture casts doubt about the claims are made in the reading. She says that the arguments are not convincing and the nests could be back to did bees.
First of all, the reading states that there are no fossils have been discovered that back to 200 million years. However, the lecturer rebuts this point by saying that the fossils need a stick liquid that exerts from specific trees to be preserved. She clarifies that this kind of trees did not exist at that time. So, that means there could be fossils that period, but there were no particular trees to preserve these fossils.
Secondly, the article mentions that there were no flowers from that era that bees could feed on. The lecture counters this argument by explaining that bees at that time could feed on different plants like pine trees. According to the professor, when bees had evolved they adapted to feed on flowers.
Thirdly, the writer says that the champers' structure of these fossils lack caps, which modern bees make them now in their nests. However, the lecturer refutes this point by mentioning that the modern bees nests have the same chemical material that found in the fossils. According to the professor, the chemical analysis approved that the same waterproof substance is found in both fossils and modern bees nests
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 24.0 12.0772626932 199% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82307692308 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18350459301 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484615384615 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.4757272515 49.2860985944 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.5714285714 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0800417129592 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326196480997 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0222503946091 0.0662205650399 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0510700847122 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297207618542 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.