The article is about a theory of the existence of bees as early as 200 million years ago. This theory is explained by the discovery of fossil structures that resemble bee nests. However, the passage explains that many skeptics doubt that the fossil structures were created by bees and provides some arguments. On the contrary, the professor in the lecture explains that the reasons in the passage are not convincing.
First, the article states that no fossils of actual bees have been found from 200 million years ago. Likewise, the professor explains that the fossil would not be preserved from that time, but he states that fossil trees from 200 million years ago lack a right resin to preserve the fossil; however, it does not mean that the bees could not exist in the past. As a result, the professor shows that bees could exist as long as 200 million years ago.
Secondly, the article claims that absence of flowering plants is another reason that shows why bees did not exist in that period of time. It also states that bees and flowering plants have a biological relationship. On the other hand, the professor explains that bees could feed on plants without flowers, such as pine trees. In addition, he explains that once the flowering plants evolved in that period, bees could adapt to the new conditions. Therefore, the professor refutes the point about the absence of flowering plants as a reason why bees did not exist 200 million years ago.
Finally, while the article explains that structures lack some details that resemble a bee’s nest, the professor, in the other hand, says that there is a chemical evidence that supports the presence of bees from that period. For example, he says that a chemical that brings water protection is an evidence that was found in the fossil. The most important evidence is that the same water material is present today in bees’ nests. As a consequence, the professor clearly explains why this last reason explained in the passage is unlikely to be true.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...at shows why bees did not exist in that period of time. It also states that bees and flowering...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, likewise, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 26.0 12.0772626932 215% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 344.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87790697674 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43095571749 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.418604651163 0.540411800872 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3425278611 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.875 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0662897681042 0.272083759551 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0295608306283 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.015105913672 0.0662205650399 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0480139683162 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132638345099 0.0443174109184 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.