The reading states that Pterosaurs were not a kind of animal which have the capabity to flight. and provide three reason of support. However, the professor assert that Pterosaurs were able to fly and opposes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading explains that Pterosaurs are Cold-blodded animals which are not to provide enough energy for flight . Also only Warm-blooded animal are able to fly. On the contrary, the professor avers that their metabolism are not as it has been thought. She explains that Pterosaurs had dense hair-covering like fur over their body and due to this they were identical to Warm-blood animal. Therefore, they had enough energy to fly.
Next, the readding asserts that Pterosaurs had big body and an importan criteria for flying is a light weight body. Nonetheless, the professor refutes this idea by explainig the anatomic features of these animals. She mentiones that their body had light size. The analysis of Pterosaurs ' bones shows that it is hollow instead of being solid and this feature helped them to have light weight in spite of their big body shape.
Finally, the reading states that animal that are able to flight have high spead and can jump to the air. Nevertheless, the professor cast doubt on this issue by comparing the differences between Pterosaurs and birds. She asserts that Pterosaurs were a kind of animal that had four leg for walking or jumping while the birds have only two 2 leg. Therefore, animal like birds need a high speed for taking off or jumping for flight but 4 leg are enough for Pterosaurs to provide enough speed or have enough support for their boddy size when they come to the ground.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...mal which have the capabity to flight. and provide three reason of support. Howeve...
^^^
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... assert that Pterosaurs were able to fly and opposes each of the authors reasons....
^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... not to provide enough energy for flight . Also only Warm-blooded animal are able ...
^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...t to provide enough energy for flight . Also only Warm-blooded animal are able to fl...
^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...nd an importan criteria for flying is a light weight body. Nonetheless, the professor refute...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d light size. The analysis of Pterosaurs bones shows that it is hollow instead of...
^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...id and this feature helped them to have light weight in spite of their big body shape. Fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... were a kind of animal that had four leg for walking or jumping while the birds h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, kind of, in spite of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88732394366 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47129161385 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496478873239 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1519230369 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.75 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395323603615 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131621360802 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857120086631 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255507203694 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839599629048 0.0443174109184 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.